As a life-long learner, I have appreciated engaging and interacting with a wide variety of educators in a few Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs). The concept of a MOOC is has been around for a while. In previous blog posts, I have shared the definition of a MOOC and my participation and experience. I have appreciated learning from the #eci831 and #CCK09 MOOC facilitators, such as Alec Couros, George Siemens & Stephen Downes. Even more, I appreciate the knowledge shared by invited speakers and the connected learning participants who I continue to engage and exchange with beyond the course structure. MOOCs are now on the tip of everyone’s tongue due to recent education technology start-ups who are now designing MOOC-like courses and creating partnerships with many accredited higher education institutions. What’s all the MOOC about if the concept of a MOOC is not a new innovation?
Image c/o Flickr user guilia.forsythe
In a recent CBC radio interview and blog post, George Siemens discusses more about the good and bad aspects of Massively Open Online Courses are for online learning. There are different sides of the camp on this topic. Some believe MOOCs will either kill or transform the academy as we know it. Here are some interesting points that were shared in the interview from George and callers to the show:
Current Learning & Development = #AltProDev
If there is an interesting alternative professional development (#AltProDev) opportunity available – I’m there! Part of the reason why I have connected to podcasting with BreakDrink.com or participation in Twitter Chats (#AcAdv Chat, #SAchat or #PhDchat) can be attributed to my early learning experiences with MOOCs. I enjoy engaging in PD to improve my skills and add to my knowledge repertoire. Across various personal and professional spheres, I have learned a great deal at formal conferences, workshops and education sessions; however, I am also proud to say I learn a great deal from my informal training and development environments that are primarily cultivated online. I think that MOOCs provide a set time period for professionals to learn about a specific topic and engage with others in a similar informal fashion. What is neat about this classroom is, that although the course might end, your network and learning artifacts continue to thrive outside the specific learning environment.
Teaching locally but accredit widely.
As a current student in higher education (I’m in process of working on my doctoral degree in learning technologies at UNT), I tend to research, read, archive, and share online to keep on top of the trends and happenings. I think my involvement in MOOCs have connected me to new concepts, research ideas, learning networks, and continue to support my formal education goals. My intention when signing up for this type of free, online learning was to support my own professional development and expose myself to new learning concepts. I reflected my MOOC experiences to my faculty advisor and he believed that participation in any one of these classes could be an added elective for my doctoral degree plan since this informal learning environment was contributing to my research design. How would this type of learning be looked like at your institution for degree requirements? Here is one suggestion for earning college credit from MOOCs if interested.
Sustainable model? Or Just Branding?
The MOOC talk seems to be all the rage as start-up companies, such as Coursera, edX, and Udacity, partner to “reshape online learning” with well-known higher education institutions. Will the massive hype of these MOOC types lead to effective use and sustainable funding models? Or is this just another method for marketing and propagation of the university brand? I do not know. I agree with George’s thoughts – we will see after the dust settles and the MOOC hype levels off in higher education.
Types of MOOCs
As the online learning trend grows there will be various types, targets and tiered offerings of MOOCs. Some of the MOOCs I have reviewed have included areas for digital competence, open education and technical resources. The content, subjects, platforms and learning environments will vary from MOOC to MOOC – and will most likely depend on the partnering institutions influence as well. Online learning will continue to be part of higher education curriculum at many institutions, but as George says “open and online courses is not going to be what cures the ails of online education.” I concur.
Incomplete = Failure?
Does a lack of commitment or completion mean that a MOOC failed? In looking at the retention and completion rates of MOOCs, the numbers vary from start to finish of a MOOC. Audrey Watters wrote a great about dropping out of MOOCs last week. She questioned if it was the content, instructor, platform or learner themselves. Good questions. If this was a multiple choice test, I might even select (E) Any of the above. Or perhaps our MOOC participants would commit more if they paid to learn – even $2 Would the freemium model commit participants more if there was a certification, badge, or accreditation for courses attached? Does extrinsic motivation trump the intrinsic goal for learning and self-fulfillment? I’m not sure.
Dynamics of MOOCs vs. Organic Classroom Experience
There are many pedagogical and theoretical underpinnings for MOOCs. If designed well, a number of online education opportunities allow for discussion, problem-solving, reflection, and unique dynamic interactions. A question from one of the callers to the CBC radio program asked (paraphrased) – can online education and MOOCs really replace the organic interactions in a face-to-face classroom environment? My initial response = it depends. I have always thought good teaching and solid learning outcomes is what drives the course. That being said it is important to note that technology is “not just a tool.” As a student, I have been in both fantastic and terrible courses both online and in class. Depending on the course purpose and objectives, instructors have the POTENTIAL to engage learners in a truly immersive and participative online learning environment. Technology is the instrument; the students are the musicians – it is up to the instructor to orchestrate and guide the collaborative instrumental play in online education.
What are your thoughts about MOOCs? Have you participated in a MOOC? Are you planning to participate in a MOOC in the near future? Please share.
76 thoughts on “Online Learning: More Than Just a MOOC”
Reblogged this on Things I grab, motley collection .
Thanks for the reblog. Glad you like it!
glad you posted it to begin with ^_^ thanks for taking time to leave a comment.
Nice blog. As a committed MOOC follower I agree with the enjoyment factor. “Liking” to learn seems a prerequisite to MOOCing–proven by how frustrating they can be to navigate appears to be a feature for many of us rather than barrier. Also, MOOCs given outside the corporate swamp of higher education (or hype-er education with the new corporate ed “moocs”) appeal to my autonomy as a learner. I simply don’t like intermediaries between me and the material. I don’t like “guidance” from curriculum developed for the most common learner and the robotic teaching habits of tired out instructors.
MOOCs refresh my interest in learning. I know that isn’t enough to be called some form of “school” in a world where purpose is so important. My opinion is Big Education can adopt the MOOC format, domesticate it to their needs and wring the human element out of it. The real social role and importance of MOOCs is outside the system where curiosity and wonder are still allowed.
Thanks for reading and for posting such a thoughtful comment. I hope that you continue to learn & MOOC with the best of them. I would agree with you that the social element and dynamics of MOOCs have always been organic, so I am not sure how manufactured MOOCs will look like — we shall see (I was looking at a couple of sections for learning this fall). Happy MOOC-ing to you!
I really enjoyed this post. I admire the way you have synthesised a range of resources to guide and support readers. Your conclusion encouraged me to think about riffing as well as conducting (http://keithlyons.me/2012/07/17/accidental-readers-connected-learners-curators/).
Thanks, Keith. I thought it would be helpful for others who want to know more about MOOCs & why this word is all the rage these days.
I appreciate your suggestions on riffing & curation. Thanks for sharing.