Learning Community, MGMT6820

Population Ecology & the Evolution of Our Learning Organizations

During last week’s organizational theory seminar, I helped lead a discussion about population ecology. As defined by Colyvan (2008), a population is a collection of individual of the same species that live together in a region. Population ecology is the study of populations (especially population abundance) and how they change over time.” Organizations are often classified into different “species” that coexits in an environment that change over time and space. These changes that occur at the environmental level, lead to selection of the best fitting organizations.  In other words, the organizations who survive will be those who best fit the environment and are therefore selected.  There are other arguments in population ecology that imply adaptation and sustainable systems may be alternative routes for survival.  Here is a quick snap shot of the population theories we reviewed that explains the evolution:

After examining the dynamics of populations and how populations interact with the environment, it is easy to see how this is currently impacting learning organizations. Learning networks are both changing and challenging what traditional learning looks like. Beyond the influence of technology, there are paradigm shifts within education – both in the K-12 and higher education environment. The focus is now student-centered with engaged and experiential learning. More educators include authentic, problem-based, and self-regulated learning opportunities into their curriculum. When the classroom is flipped, learners are encouraged to be part of the cooperative learning program. As learning population ecology evolves it also gives way to new players that impact the environment, such as P2PU and Udacity. It is relevant to consider how the open learning environment will interact with traditional educational models. Will these seats be filled for long?  How can open and connected learning environments “play well” with the current educational models?

Many of these issues are being reviewed at different organizational levels to determine the efficiency and value added.  For sustainability of learning and to support our learners needs, it is important for more institutions to think broadly about the impact of population ecology for learning. Are we considering the rational organizational system as a function of accountability? Or do we need to consider how resources are being adapted to support creation and our changing learner needs?

When applying population ecology theory to current learning organizations, it often provides more questions than solutions.  I do not have answers for these issues yet; however I think they are quite relevant and more educators need to consider what the future learning environments will look like. 

Population Ecology Resources:

Smith, Adam (1776) Of the division of labour. In Shafritz and Ott (eds.), (1987) Classics of Organization Theory, 2nd edition, chapter 2, 30-35.  (chp 2, 6th ed)

Fayol, Henri (1949) General principles of management. In Shafritz and Ott (eds.), (1987) Classics of Organization Theory, 2nd edition, chapter 6, 51-66. (chp 5, 6th ed)

Weber, Max (1946) Bureaucracy. In Shafritz and Ott (eds.), (1987) Classics of Organization Theory, 2nd edition, chapter 8, 81-87. (chp 7, 6th ed)

Blau, P. M. (1970) A formal theory of differentiation in organization. American Sociological Review, 35, 201-218

Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 929-964

Carroll, Glenn R. (1984). Organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology 10: 71-93.

Baum, J. A. & Oliver, C. (1992). Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Sociological Review 57(4): 540-559.

Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J. (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, Vol.49, 149-164.


Additional readings

Gulick, L. (1937) Notes on the theory of organization. In Shafritz and Ott (eds.), (1987) Classics of Organization Theory, 2nd edition, chapter 9, 87-97. (chp 8, 6th ed)

Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (1961) Mechanistic and organic systems. In Shafritz & Ott

Thompson, J. D. (1967) Organizations in action. In Shafritz & Ott

Lawrence, P.R. & Lorsch, J.W. (1969) Organization-environment interface. In Shafritz & Ott

Stinchombe, A.L. (1959) Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: a comparative study. Administrative Science Quarterly, Sept. 168-87.

Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2000). Organizational ecology has a bright future. Organization Studies, 21(2): V-XV. Editorial

Amburgey, T. L. & Rao, Hayagreeva (1996). Organizational ecology: Past, present, and future directions. Academy of Management Journal 39(5): 1265-1286.

Singh, J. V. & Lumsden, C. J. (1990). Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology 16(1990): 161-195.

Kearney, R. C. (2003). Patterns of union decline and growth: An organizational ecology perspective. Journal of Labor Research 24(4): 561-578.

Salimath, M. S. & Jones, R. (2011) Population Ecology Theory: Implications for Sustainability. Management Decision, 49 (6): 874-910.


More Than [One] Word[s] #oneword2012 #fantabulous

The new year is upon us and my PLN has already been quite busy setting goals and making new year’s resolutions. During some of this new year happenings, came the appearance of  the #oneword2012 movement. I thought  – how can I find just one word to represent the  year ahead. There are just so many things I want to do this year. How can I accomplish everything in just ONE WORD? After reflecting, reviewing the dictionary/thesaurus, and consulting Fiachra – truth is I can’t.  [He indicated that I could do much better than scholarship, motivation & completion.] I agree.

During my first class tonight [MGMT 6820: Seminar in Organizational Theory], I was inspired to consider my word of the year from Dr. Salimath:


During our meeting, Dr. Salimath reminded our class that we are in the business of “expanding the frontiers of knowledge” and “generating ideas.” She wants us to aim for great things. With a very small percentage of the world’s population possess a Ph.D., it is the responsibility of researchers in our respective fields to represent the sphere of influence and change. It is only suitable that an innovative, created word “fantabulous” is the best fit for my #oneword2012. Here are a few ways that Dr. Salimath suggested our scholarship should unfold  within our class and as researcher this year:

  1. Research high quality information.
  2. Extract “value” from what you read, consume and research.
  3. Develop the capacity to be an “innovative” thinker.
  4. Examine questions with rigor and soundness – think deep and with detail.
  5. Synthesize and apply to address problems and find solutions.
  6. Make meaningful “connections” to reality – ground abstractions and concepts.

How will you be fantabulous this year? Inspire & challenge me.

For those of you interested in Organizational Theory, I will be sure to post a weekly reflection about the readings and discussions from this course. Stay tuned.